A Case for Joseph Smith; A Case Against
Polygamy
Part 3
(Please start on Part 1: http://www.confessionsofanelder.blogspot.com/2012/06/case-for-joseph-smith-case-against.html)
(Please start on Part 1: http://www.confessionsofanelder.blogspot.com/2012/06/case-for-joseph-smith-case-against.html)
“Inasmuch
as this church has been reproached with the crime of fornication, and polygamy;
we declare that we believe that one man should have one wife; and one woman,
but one husband.” – D&C 101 (1835 and 1844 editions) (revelation dated,
December 16, 1833)
“I wish the
grand jury would tell me who they [the alleged plural wives] are – whether it
will be a curse or blessing to me. I am
quite tired of the fools asking me. . . . What a thing it is for a man [Joseph]
to be accused of committing adultery, and having seven wives, when I can only
find one.” – Joseph Smith
Van
Wagoner: Joseph Damned the Practice of
Polygamy
Richard Van Wagoner is an LDS Church historian and writer
best known for his books Sidney
Rigdon: A Portrait of Religious Excess
and Mormon Polygamy: A History.
Richard was a member of the LDS Church until the day he died in 2010.[1] His 1994 biography of Sidney Rigdon
won awards from the Mormon History Association and the John Whitmer Historical Association. Without ever investigating the matter, Van
Wagoner never doubted that Joseph Smith revealed the doctrine of polygamy;
however, Van Wagoner’s work strongly indicates the LDS Church knowingly concealed Joseph Smith’s discourses
against polygamy, an important fact in weighing the evidence of truth.
1.
Richard Van Wagoner, Sidney Rigdon: A
Portrait of Religious Excess, p. 292:
“The Prophet warned against ‘iniquitous
characters [who] say they have authority from Joseph or the First Presidency’
and advising them not to ‘believe anything as coming from us, contrary to the
established morals & virtues & scriptural laws . . .’ The sisters were urged to denounce any man
who made polygamous proposals and to ‘shun them as the flying fiery
serpent, whether they are Prophets, Seers, or Revelators; Patriarchs,
Twelve Apostles, Elders, Priests, Majors, Generals, City Councilors, Aldermen,
Marshals, Police, Lord mayors or the Devil, [they] are alike culpable & shall
be damned for such evil practices.”
(Emphasis added).
Unequivocally and without qualification, Joseph was condemning
to hell any man who advocated polygamy, even if that man was the prophet himself. Why would Joseph direct members to “denounce”
the prophet, i.e., Joseph Smith, if the prophet was surreptitiously preaching
polygamy behind closed doors?
If Joseph was a polygamous, wouldn’t Joseph at the very least insert conditional or waffling language (e.g., “unauthorized polygamous proposals”)? Despite the LDS Church’s repeated claims that Joseph was only referring to unauthorized polygamy as practiced in the orient and by Dr. Bennett, the above language evinces that Joseph did not waffle or equivocate in denouncing polygamy in all its forms.
If Joseph was a polygamous, wouldn’t Joseph at the very least insert conditional or waffling language (e.g., “unauthorized polygamous proposals”)? Despite the LDS Church’s repeated claims that Joseph was only referring to unauthorized polygamy as practiced in the orient and by Dr. Bennett, the above language evinces that Joseph did not waffle or equivocate in denouncing polygamy in all its forms.
2.
Richard Van Wagoner, Mormon Polygamy: A
History:
“The Prophet’s most pointed denial
of plural marriage occurred on 5 October 1843 in instructions pronounced
publicly in the streets of Nauvoo. Willard
Richards wrote in Smith’s diary that Joseph ‘gave instructions to try those who
were preaching, teaching, or practicing the doctrine of plurality of wives . . .
Joseph
forbids it and the practice thereof.
No man shall have but one wife.’” Id. at 292 (emphasis added).
3.
Van Wagoner’s footnote to the above quote, on
page 303 states:
“When incorporating Smith’s journal
into the History of the Church, church leaders, under Brigham Young’s
direction, deleted ten key words from
this significant passage and added
forty-nine others so that it now reads:
“Gave instructions to try those
persons who were preaching, teaching, or practicing the doctrine of plurality
of wives; for, according to the law, I hold the keys of this power in the last
days; for there is never but one on earth at a time on whom the power and its
keys are conferred and I have constantly said no man shall have but one
wife at a time, unless the Lord directs otherwise.” (Emphasis added).
Missing entirely from Joseph’s statement in the official rewritten
history is the primary directive, “Joseph forbids it and the practice thereof.” In other words, LDS Church leaders, under the
direction of Brigham Young, knowingly
rewrote the above journal to convey the nearly opposite meaning. At the very least, Brigham Young demonstrated
a penchant to falsify doctrine and alter Church history in order to support the
LDS Church’s claim that Joseph revealed polygamy.[2] This fact alone should cause every member of
the LDS Church to suspect and question the veracity of Brigham Young’s claims;
unfortunately, many will fail to reach this rightful conclusion.
4.
Richard S. Van Wagoner wrote in “The Making of a
Mormon Myth: The 1844 Transfiguration of
Brigham Young” Dialogue, Vol. 28, No. 4, Winter 1995, pp.2–3:
The Twelve’s nineteenth-century
propaganda mill was so adroit that few outside Brigham Young’s inner circle
were aware of the behind-the-scenes alterations that were seamlessly stitched
into church history. Charles Wesley
Wandell, an assistant church historian who later left the church, was aghast at
these emendations. Commenting on the
many changes made in the historical work as it was being serialized, Wandell
noted in his diary:
“I notice the interpolations
because having been employed in the Historian’s office at Nauvoo by Doctor
Richards, and employed, too, in 1845, in compiling this very autobiography, I
know that after Joseph’s death his memoir was “doctored” to suit the new order
of things, and this, too, by the direct order of Brigham Young to Doctor
Richards and systematically by Richards.”
More than a dozen references to
Brigham Young’s involvement in transposing the written history may be found in
the post-martyrdom record first published in book form in 1902 as History of
the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. For example, an 1 April 1845 citation records Young saying: “I commenced revising the History of Joseph
Smith at Brother Richard’s office: Elder
Heber C. Kimball and George A. Smith were with me.”
That this revision, or censorship,
of the official history came from Brigham Young is evidenced by an 11 July 1856
reference in Wilford Woodruff’s diary. Apostle
Woodruff, working in the church historian’s office, questioned Young respecting
a “p[ie]ce of History on Book E-1 page 1681-2 concerning Hyr[u]m leading this
Church & tracing the [A]aronic Priesthood.” Young advised, “it was not essential to be
inserted in the History & had better be omitted.” Woodruff then queried him
about “Joseph[s] words on South Carolina” (see D&C 87; 130:12-13) which had
recently been published in the Deseret News. Young said he “wished it not published.” Years later Elder Charles W. Penrose, a member of
the First Presidency, admitted that after Joseph Smith’s death some changes
were made in the official record “for prudential reasons.”
Joseph’s
Letter in Liberty Jail
While imprisoned in Liberty Jail, Joseph denounced polygamy
in a letter he wrote to the Saints in Caldwell County, dated December 16, 1839[3]
(eight years after Joseph supposedly
introduced polygamy), ending with the warning that “if any person has
represented anything otherwise than what we now write they have willfully
misrepresented us.” Joseph wrote:
“Know assuredly Dear brethren, that
it is for the testimony of Jesus, that we are in bonds and in prison . . . .
Was it for committing adultery? We are aware that false and slanderous reports
have gone abroad, which have reached our ears, respecting this thing, which
have been started by renegades, and spread by the dissenters, who are extremely
active in spreading foul and libelous reports concerning us; thinking
thereby to gain the fellowship of the world . . . . Some have reported that we
not only dedicated our property, but likewise our families to the Lord, and
Satan taking advantage of this has transfigured it into lasciviousness, a community of
wives [polygamy], which things are an abomination in the sight of God.
When we consecrate our property to
the Lord, it is to administer to the wants of the poor and needy according to
the laws of God, and when a man consecrates or dedicates his wife and children
to the Lord, he does not give them to his brother or to his neighbor; which is
contrary to the law of God, which says, ‘Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou
shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife.’ ‘He
that looketh upon a woman to lust after her has committed adultery already in
his heart.’ Now for a man to consecrate
his property, his wife and children to the Lord is nothing more nor less than
to feed the hungry, cloth the naked, visit the widows and fatherless, the sick
and afflicted; and do all he can to administer to their relief in their
afflictions, and for himself and his house to serve the Lord. In order to do this he and all his house must
be virtuous and shun every appearance of evil. Now if any person, has represented anything
otherwise than what we now write they have willfully misrepresented us.”
A
Question and Answer on Polygamy
While Joseph and other Church leaders were journeying from
Kirtland to Far West in the fall of 1837, they were asked by non-members if the
Church believed in polygamy. Joseph
listed twenty “questions which are daily and hourly asked by all classes of
people whilst we are traveling.” One question
was, “Do the Mormons believe in having more wives than one?” Elders’ Journal 1
[November 1837]: 28. Joseph answered, “No,
not at the same time. But they believe,
that if their companion dies, they have a right to marry again.” Id., July 1838: 43. Joseph was the editor of the Elders’ Journal,
so this statement came directly from him in 1838, i.e., five years after Joseph
allegedly married Fannie Alger. See also May 1, 1838, as quoted in “Teachings
of the Prophet Joseph Smith,” p. 119.
Joseph either lied or was telling the truth – there is no middle ground
that Joseph was directing his condemnation as to the form of polygamy.
Joseph’s
Speech One Month before His Death
Less than a month before Joseph’s martyrdom, thousands of Saints witnessed Joseph
denounce the doctrine of polygamy and those who would accuse him of
promulgating it. The address is in The
History of the Church under the title “Address of
the Prophet – His Testimony Against the Dissenters at Nauvoo,”
delivered Sunday, May 26, 1844, Id. Vol. 6, p. 408-412.
Joseph declared:
“Another indictment has been got up
against me [the polygamy indictment]. It
appears a holy prophet [William Law] has arisen up, and he has testified
against me [causing the polygamy indictment to be brought forth] . . . . God
knows, then, that the charges against me are false.
I had not been married scarcely five
minutes, and made one proclamation of the Gospel, before it was reported that I
had seven wives. I mean to live
and proclaim the truth as long as I can.
This new holy prophet [William Law]
has gone to Carthage and swore that I had told him that I was guilty of
adultery. This spiritual wifeism[5]!
Why, a man dares not speak or wink, for
fear of being accused of this . . . . William Law . . . swears that I have
committed adultery. I
wish the grand jury would tell me who they [the alleged wives] are—whether it
will be a curse or blessing to me . . . .
A man asked me whether the
commandment [revelation] was given that a man may have seven wives; and now the
new prophet has charged me with adultery . . . . Wilson Law [William’s brother]
also swears that I told him I was guilty of adultery . . . . I have rattled
chains before in a dungeon for truth’s sake. I am innocent of all these charges, and you
can bear witness of my innocence, for you know me yourselves . . . . What a
thing it is for a man to be accused of committing adultery, and having seven
wives, when I can only find one.
I am the same man, and as
innocent as I was fourteen years ago [when charged with polygamy shortly after
his marriage to Emma Hale]; and I can prove them all perjurers.” LDS History of the Church, 6:410–411
(emphasis added).
Joseph equated polygamy with adultery and stated that he was
the victim of repeated lies spread by Joseph’s enemies. Without a doubt, Joseph stated that he was
monogamous. On the other hand, Joseph
NEVER preached a public sermon nor made a public statement in favor of plural
marriage. As noted by Richard and Pamela
Price: “In the same volume, on page 474,
is report of a sermon by the prophet from the stand in Nauvoo, June 6 [16],
1844. In one passage they report him as
saying: ‘I have taught all the strong
doctrines publicly, and always taught stronger doctrines in public than in
private.’ That was about ten days before
his death and effectually disposes of the Utah claim that he taught the strong
(and rank) doctrine of polygamy in private, not daring to teach it in
public. Salt Lake can hardly repudiate
its own version of these sermons . . .” p. 108.
Please continue to Part 4 (http://www.confessionsofanelder.blogspot.com/2012/06/case-for-joseph-smith-case-against_22.html)
[1] See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Van_Wagoner.
[2] In
Joseph F. Smith’s 1905 correspondence to Richard C. Evans of the “Reorganized”
church, Mr. Smith attached the same revised and false statement as key proof
that Joseph Smith was the founder of polygamy.
[3]
Note that Joseph Smith had allegedly first entered into a polygamous relationship
in early 1833 with Fanny Alger.
[4]
The Times and Seasons was a
19th-century Latter Day Saint periodical published
monthly or twice-monthly at Nauvoo,
Illinois,
from November 1839
to February 15, 1846. The publication
was the first to include such significant Latter Day
Saint documents as “The Wentworth Letter,” the “King Follett Discourse,” the Book of
Abraham, the personal history of Joseph Smith,
Jr., and the announcement of the assassination of Joseph and Hyrum Smith. Initially, the publication was edited by
Ebenezer Robinson and Don Carlos Smith (a brother of Joseph Smith,
Jr.). After the death of D.C. Smith in 1841, Joseph Smith,
Jr. himself became the chief editor, assisted by John Taylor. In November 1842, Taylor became the
principal editor, assisted by Willard
Richards. The motto of the
paper was “Truth will prevail.”
[5]
“Spirtual wifeism” was a term used by the Cochranites in reference to polygamy.
Thankyou! I appreciate your hard work researching, and I too have been on a quest for truth. Having obtained a copy of Joseph And Emma's son Joseph Smith III 's Memoirs I have discovered more knowledge.
ReplyDeleteI read your blog last year with interest ... Having been a devout LDS since 1985 and a Temple attendee since 1993, it made sense to me to have these findings brought to the surface.
Thank you for your kind words.
Delete